Brexit: Draft agreement on future relationship right for UK, says May



A joint document on Britain’s post-Brexit relationship with the EU fails to give hope of frictionless trade said to be vital to the British economy, but offers Theresa May arguments to bolster her hopes of selling the deal to the Brexiters in parliament.

A leaked 26-page political declaration, to be approved by EU leaders at a Brexit summit on Sunday, paints a picture of the future relationship that differs substantially from the proposals made by the prime minister at Chequers in the summer.

May is expected to give a statement on the declaration to the House of Commons later on Thursday.

Speaking outside Downing Street after briefing the cabinet by phone, May said the agreement “delivers on the vote of the referendum”, and urged MPs to support it.

She said: “The British people want this to be settled. They want a good deal that sets us on course for a brighter future. That deal is within our grasp, and I am determined to deliver it.”

According to the declaration the two sides “envisage having a trading relationship on goods that is as close as possible”, but the EU and the UK will be separate markets with inevitable barriers to trade, and there is no reference to a common rulebook.

The document does reassert the plan for both sides to “build and improve on the single customs territory” already negotiated in the withdrawal agreement.

The UK has accepted in the withdrawal agreement, approved by both sides, that the country will stay in a customs union with the EU should a trade deal that can avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland not be ready to come into force by the end of the transition period.

The text reiterates the longstanding EU red line that British access to European markets will only be offered on the basis of “open and fair competition”. To gain a close economic relationship, the UK would have to respect EU standards on competition, tax, environment, as well as social and employment protection.

But in a major sop to the Brexiters in her party, the prime minister has successfully argued for the inclusion of language that she might use to convince her critics that the customs union backstop may not be the only solution in the long term.

The document claims that “facilitative arrangements and technologies will also be considered in developing any alternative arrangements for ensuring the absence of a hard border on the island of Ireland on a permanent footing”.

The pro-Brexit European Research Group, chaired by Jacob Rees-Mogg, has expressed its vehement opposition to a customs union, and lobbied hard for such an alternative plan, known as “maximum facilitation”, to avoiding a customs border being drawn in the Irish Sea.

Donald Tusk, the European council president, tweeted: “I have just sent to EU27 a draft political declaration on the future relationship between EU and UK. The commission president has informed me that it has been agreed at negotiators’ level and agreed in principle at political level, subject to the endorsement of the leaders.”

A spokesman for the European commission said the “ball is in the member states’ courts” now to agree on the deal negotiated between Brussels and Downing Street, but that further work was on-going on the contentious issues of Gibraltar and fisheries.

Spain is demanding that any future trade deal only applies to Gibraltar, a disputed territory, if Madrid gives its consent.

In her statement in Downing Street, May expressed confidence the issue could be solved, saying: “Last night I spoke to the Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, and I am confident that on Sunday we’ll be able to agree a deal that delivers for the whole UK family, including Gibraltar.”

No 10 feels that the text of the political declaration has improved considerably in the last few days, and is particularly satisfied with the language on “alternative arrangements” – including technological solutions – which could help appease hard Brexiters concerned about the possibility that the Irish backstop would ever be used.

It was felt by the UK that it made sense to agree the document promptly to lock in the gains that had been made, amid concerns that EU members states such as Spain were beginning to push back on the wider Brexit deal. The Spanish have raised concerns about the long-term status of Gibraltar, but as far as the UK is concerned the status of Gibraltar has been settled in the withdrawal agreement.

The document further commits both sides to coming to an agreement six months before the end of the 21-month transition period after Brexit on a fisheries deal on “access to waters and quota shares”.

France was particularly keen for the political declaration to link the UK’s willingness to stay close to the current arrangement with the bloc’s opening up of its markets to British exports.

The leaked draft text, obtained by the Guardian, outlines the basis for future relations between the UK and EU, spanning the economy, security, foreign policy and how to manage possible disputes.

Trade talks, which have been billed by the Brexit-supporting trade secretary, Liam Fox, as “the easiest in human history” are due to begin in April 2019, after the UK has left the EU.

In the text, both sides agree to start formal negotiations “as soon as possible” after the UK leaves the EU on 29 March 2019, with the aim of having a deal enter into force by the end of 2020.

The timing sets the bar high, suggesting that negotiators on both sides are confident they can strike a deal far more quickly than the seven-year EU-Canada talks, which are often given as a benchmark. It also shows both sides want to avoid the controversial Irish backstop, as well as an extended transition that would leave the UK following EU rules without any say.

The two sides would meet through “a high-level conference” every six months to assess progress. In a win for May, the document proposes regular EU-UK summits, one of the prime minister’s Chequers proposals.

We have some news …

… three years ago, we knew we had to try to make The Guardian sustainable by deepening our relationship with our readers. The revenues from our newspaper had diminished and the technologies that connected us with a global audience had moved advertising money away from news organisations. We knew we needed to find a way to keep our journalism open and accessible to everyone, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.

And so, we have an update for you on some good news. Thanks to all the readers who have supported our independent, investigative journalism through contributions, membership or subscriptions, we are starting to overcome the urgent financial situation we were faced with. Today we have been supported by more than a million readers around the world. Our future is starting to look brighter. But we have to maintain and build on that level of support for every year to come, which means we still need to ask for your help.

Ongoing financial support from our readers means we can continue pursuing difficult stories in the challenging times we are living through, when factual reporting has never been more critical. The Guardian is editorially independent – our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. This is important because it enables us to challenge the powerful and hold them to account. With your support, we can continue bringing The Guardian’s independent journalism to the world.


-The Guardian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.